Security tools are very good at producing findings and very bad at producing outcomes.
The queue grows, the dashboard turns red, and the engineering team receives a ticket saying 'S3 bucket policy is overly permissive' with a link back to the tool. Nobody disagrees that it should be fixed. It does not get fixed, because turning that sentence into a correct change against a specific bucket in a specific account is the actual work, and the tool left it undone.
The risk of not knowing
If it is not surfaced today, it is exposed today. Attackers do not wait for your quarterly review — and neither do auditors.
The mechanism, not the marketing
- 1
Every finding carries a remediation record generated for that specific resource — not a generic knowledge-base article.
- 2
Cloud misconfigurations produce an exact CLI command, a Terraform snippet matching your resource, or console steps.
- 3
Code and IaC findings from SAST, DAST and SCA are remediated by the code-fix engine, which proposes a patch and can open a pull request against the repository the finding came from.
- 4
Vulnerability findings produce a version-targeted upgrade path, checked against the dependency graph so the suggested bump does not break a transitive constraint.
- 5
A threat narrative generator explains the finding as an attack story — what an attacker gains, and what the fix removes — so prioritisation conversations are about impact rather than severity labels.
Specific outputs, measurable outcomes
Remediation & Auto-Fix in the real console.
Not a mockup — the actual Onam console on a live demo account, showing exactly what your team sees.
Questions we get a lot
Ready to see Remediation & Auto-Fix in your cloud?
Connect a read-only role in three minutes. Your first findings surface in under five.