Onam Security
Code Security

Will the misconfiguration I just fixed come back on the next deploy?

Fix it where the resource is defined, not where it happens to be running.

SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC and secret scanning, correlated with what is actually running in your cloud — so a finding traces back to the template that created it, and the fix holds.

10,000+
security rules
7
cloud providers
< 5 min
to first finding
100%
agentless
Why this matters

An engineer unchecks 'public access' on a bucket in the console and closes the finding.

The next terraform apply recreates the bucket exactly as the template describes it, because the template was never changed. The finding returns, gets re-triaged, gets fixed in the console again. Everyone is busy and nothing improves — and meanwhile a dependency scan returns 400 findings sorted by CVSS, most of them in code paths the application never executes.

The risk of not knowing

If it is not surfaced today, it is exposed today. Attackers do not wait for your quarterly review — and neither do auditors.

Real-time detection, not periodic audits
How does it actually work?

The mechanism, not the marketing

  1. 1

    Static analysis traces untrusted input to dangerous operations in application source, and dependency analysis inventories what you actually ship — including transitive packages — against known vulnerabilities.

  2. 2

    IaC scanning evaluates Terraform, CloudFormation, Helm and Kubernetes manifests against the same policy set the runtime posture engine uses, so a template is judged before it creates anything.

  3. 3

    Secret detection runs across source, image layers, pipeline configuration and committed state — the places copies accumulate, rather than only the secrets store where things are done correctly.

  4. 4

    Findings are joined to the running estate on the same security graph, so a dependency finding carries whether the workload is internet-reachable and what identity it holds — the two facts that decide whether a CVSS score matters here.

  5. 5

    Every runtime finding keeps its provenance: which repository, template and resource block produced it, so remediation lands in code and does not reappear on the next apply.

What do you actually get?

Specific outputs, measurable outcomes

SAST across application source, with the code path that produced each finding
SCA with reachability
is the vulnerable function actually called, not just present
IaC policy evaluated against the plan, so misconfiguration is prevented rather than reported
Secret detection across source, images, pipelines and state files
Provenance on runtime findings
the repository, template and line that created the resource
Reachability and identity context joined to every dependency finding
Delta gating
fail the build on newly introduced findings, work the backlog separately
One inventory across code and cloud, so 'which running workloads ship this package' is a query
See it live

Code Security in the real console.

Not a mockup — the actual Onam console on a live demo account, showing exactly what your team sees.

Alerts
Export
All 0Critical 0High 0
Scanning 0 / 12,481 resources
SeverityFindingStatus
Analyzing resources across us-east-1, us-west-2, eu-west-1, ap-south-1…
Watch a full cloud scan
aws-prod-main → 12,481 resources → 1,051 findings ranked by severity
Clip length
11s
Data
Demo account
FAQ

Questions we get a lot

A standalone scanner reports findings about code. Onam joins those findings to the running estate on the same graph the posture, identity and network engines use — so a dependency finding carries whether that workload is reachable and what it can access next. That context is what turns several hundred CVSS-ranked findings into a short list.
Ready to see it live

Ready to see Code Security in your cloud?

Connect a read-only role in three minutes. Your first findings surface in under five.